Three Generations of Excellence 80 Years of Seeking Justice

Dayton OVI/DUI Defense Attorneys

Nationally Recognized Trial Lawyers

Being pulled over for operating a vehicle while under the influence can be an intimidating and scary event. You may have little experience facing law enforcement or the criminal justice system. You may also be worried about how a DUI will affect your future.

At such a confusing and stressful time, it is critical that you protect yourself by calling an experienced criminal defense lawyer. At Rion, Rion & Rion, our Dayton OVI/DUI defense lawyers have a successful track record of legal victories. We bring eight decades of experience and a passion for excellence to every case we handle. Our firm works vigorously to protect your legal rights and help you secure a favorable result.

Don’t wait to contact one of our seasoned defense lawyers at (937) 223-9133 to discuss your case. We serve clients in Montgomery, Greene, Warren, Clark, and Miami counties

Ohio OVI Laws

If you are pulled over for a suspected DUI, law enforcement will be watching you closely for evidence that can be used against you. If your driving was faulty or if you displayed physical signs of impairment, you will likely be asked to submit to chemical testing. If you refuse such testing, your license will be suspended automatically.

If your blood alcohol concentration (BAC) measures .08% or higher, you will be charged with OVI. You may also be charged if chemical testing shows that you were driving while under the influence of a controlled substance. Driving while under the influence of prescription drugs can also lead to a DUI.

Consequences of an OVI/DUI

The penalties you face will depend on whether this is a first offense or subsequent offense as well as whether your driving injured or killed someone.

Potential penalties include:

  • Jail or prison time
  • Fines from $375 up to $20,000
  • Loss of your driver’s license (suspension or revocation)
  • The cost and maintenance of an ignition interlock device
  • Substance abuse monitoring and treatment program
  • Court costs and fees

Why Hire Rion, Rion & Rion?

OVI is a complex legal matter and these cases are rarely black and white. You need an attorney who knows how to vigorously investigate every facet of your arrest to uncover potential legal and technical errors or violations of your rights. Our firm can get to work immediately to start building a solid defense. Do not talk to law enforcement until you call us. Our team is backed by impressive case results, court experience, and proven legal strategies.

Request a case evaluation by contacting us at (937) 223-9133 today.

Recent Case Results
Helping Our Clients Achieve the Best Possible Outcome

  • Not Guilty Aggravated Murder

    In July of 2015, the Defendant was charged with the murder of a man in Springfield. After hiring our office, we worked hard with the Defendant and his family to prepare the best defense for our client. The trial lasted two days and resulted in a Not Guilty verdict on all charges by the Jury.

  • Conviction Vacated Appeal | State vs. K.M. (2nd District Court of Appeals)

    Client was charged, and later found guilty of, tampering with evidence kept by a government entity (F3). We appealed the case on the grounds that the trial court erred in not granting the client’s motion to dismiss stating that the statute of limitations had expired. In late 2018, the appellate court reversed the client’s judgement and vacated the client’s conviction.

  • Dismissed Civil Stalking Protection Order | Against our client

    Our client received paperwork that a Civil Stalking Protection Order was placed against our client. We challenged the protection order, asking for a directed verdict. The Judge agreed, stating that there was no threats of physical harm to the alleged victim and the mental distress evidence was not sufficient.

  • Not Guilty Federal Felony Drug Possession
    In the United States Southern District Court of Ohio, the Defendant was charged with possession to distribute marijuana and marijuana plants and also the possession of a firearm while allegedly trafficking drugs. After one year of pre-trial and suppression hearings, the case finally went to a jury. The trial lasted five days at the federal court house in Dayton, Ohio and when it was over the Defendant was found Not Guilty of all charges and thus acquitted.
  • Not Guilty Murder

    After a tragic death of a young man in her care, the Defendant was charged with murder. The entire case lasted two and a half years but after a four day bench trial, the verdict was Not Guilty and all charges were dismissed.

  • Not Guilty Murder

    The Defendant, out of Springfield, Ohio, was charged with one count of murder with a death penalty specification and one count of weapons under disability. After seven busy months of pretrials and suppression hearings, the case finally went before the jury at the end of the year. It took the jury 13 hours to find the Defendant Not Guilty of Murder but Guilty of Weapons Under Disability. This was the first acquittal in Springfield in years so we were excited to usher in a new time.

  • Case Dismissed OVI

    The Defendant was on the way back from a friend’s house when she was pulled over in her car for crossing over the marked lines. She was charged with an OVI. While waiting for her chance before the jury, the Defendant was granted driving privileges with the help of our office. At the Suppression Hearing, the OVI case was dismissed and the Defendant only had to pay court costs.

  • Acquitted Robbery (Physical Harm) F2 | State vs. J.M.

    Client was accused of robbing a local Rite Aid and charged with robbery while using/threatening to use physical harm. After 2 days of trial and 4 ½ hours of deliberation, a jury returned a not guilty verdict.

  • Not Guilty | Reduced Charge Sex Crime Charges
    The Defendant was charged with one count of attempted rape and one count of abduction. After multiple hearings with the prosecution and Judge, the case went to the Jury. When the trial concluded after two days, the Jury found the Defendant Not Guilty of attempted rape and Guilty of a lesser charge of unlawful restraint. He only had to serve 60 days which his jail time credit counted for.
  • Not Guilty Unlawful Restraint M3 | State vs. BV

    Client was accused of unlawful restraint while in her position in the health care field. Our client maintained her innocence throughout the case. After 2 days of trial, the jury returned a not guilty verdict.

Why Rion, Rion & Rion?

Schedule a Free Case Evaluation Today
  1. 80 Years of Experience
  2. More than 500 Jury Trials Handled
  3. Free Initial Case Evaluation
  4. Available 24/7, 365 Days a Year
  5. 10.0 AVVO Rating
  6. President of the American Board of Criminal Lawyers
  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email address.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
    You entered an invalid number.
  • Please select an option.
  • Please enter a message.