80 Years of Excellence Three Generations of Seeking Justice

About Rion, Rion & Rion

Experienced & Board-Certified Attorneys in Dayton

Rion, Rion & Rion was founded by Paul W. Rion. Paul Rion was John H. Rion’s father and Jon Paul Rion’s grandfather. Paul Rion started his own law firm in 1938 in Dayton, Ohio and practiced law for more than 30 years. He was a frequent acting judge in the Dayton Municipal Court and set the structure for the firm now known as Rion, Rion & Rion.

Today, our firm offers a wide range of legal services to help the individuals and families of Montgomery, Greene, Warren, Clark, and Miami counties. Our Dayton attorneys look forward to helping you achieve your goals through reliable, high-quality representation.

Get in touch with us today by calling (937) 223-9133 or contacting us online.

Three Generations of Excellence

At Rion, Rion & Rion, we prioritize honesty, authenticity, and hard work. We believe that every case deserves the same razor-sharp focus and personalized attention.

Our attorneys practice:

  • Criminal defense
  • Personal injury
  • Family law
  • Probate law

Our services are always client-focused and results-driven. Our passion is to protect your rights, defend your honor, and safeguard your freedom. We are available 24/7, 365 days a year and even offer services in Spanish for your convenience.

To learn more about our team, contact us at (937) 223-9133.

Recent Case Results
Helping Our Clients Achieve the Best Possible Outcome

  • Not Guilty Aggravated Murder

    In July of 2015, the Defendant was charged with the murder of a man in Springfield. After hiring our office, we worked hard with the Defendant and his family to prepare the best defense for our client. The trial lasted two days and resulted in a Not Guilty verdict on all charges by the Jury.

  • Conviction Vacated Appeal | State vs. K.M. (2nd District Court of Appeals)

    Client was charged, and later found guilty of, tampering with evidence kept by a government entity (F3). We appealed the case on the grounds that the trial court erred in not granting the client’s motion to dismiss stating that the statute of limitations had expired. In late 2018, the appellate court reversed the client’s judgement and vacated the client’s conviction.

  • Dismissed Civil Stalking Protection Order | Against our client

    Our client received paperwork that a Civil Stalking Protection Order was placed against our client. We challenged the protection order, asking for a directed verdict. The Judge agreed, stating that there was no threats of physical harm to the alleged victim and the mental distress evidence was not sufficient.

  • Not Guilty Federal Felony Drug Possession
    In the United States Southern District Court of Ohio, the Defendant was charged with possession to distribute marijuana and marijuana plants and also the possession of a firearm while allegedly trafficking drugs. After one year of pre-trial and suppression hearings, the case finally went to a jury. The trial lasted five days at the federal court house in Dayton, Ohio and when it was over the Defendant was found Not Guilty of all charges and thus acquitted.
  • Not Guilty Murder

    After a tragic death of a young man in her care, the Defendant was charged with murder. The entire case lasted two and a half years but after a four day bench trial, the verdict was Not Guilty and all charges were dismissed.

  • Not Guilty Murder

    The Defendant, out of Springfield, Ohio, was charged with one count of murder with a death penalty specification and one count of weapons under disability. After seven busy months of pretrials and suppression hearings, the case finally went before the jury at the end of the year. It took the jury 13 hours to find the Defendant Not Guilty of Murder but Guilty of Weapons Under Disability. This was the first acquittal in Springfield in years so we were excited to usher in a new time.

  • Case Dismissed OVI

    The Defendant was on the way back from a friend’s house when she was pulled over in her car for crossing over the marked lines. She was charged with an OVI. While waiting for her chance before the jury, the Defendant was granted driving privileges with the help of our office. At the Suppression Hearing, the OVI case was dismissed and the Defendant only had to pay court costs.

  • Acquitted Robbery (Physical Harm) F2 | State vs. J.M.

    Client was accused of robbing a local Rite Aid and charged with robbery while using/threatening to use physical harm. After 2 days of trial and 4 ½ hours of deliberation, a jury returned a not guilty verdict.

  • Not Guilty | Reduced Charge Sex Crime Charges
    The Defendant was charged with one count of attempted rape and one count of abduction. After multiple hearings with the prosecution and Judge, the case went to the Jury. When the trial concluded after two days, the Jury found the Defendant Not Guilty of attempted rape and Guilty of a lesser charge of unlawful restraint. He only had to serve 60 days which his jail time credit counted for.
  • Not Guilty Unlawful Restraint M3 | State vs. BV

    Client was accused of unlawful restraint while in her position in the health care field. Our client maintained her innocence throughout the case. After 2 days of trial, the jury returned a not guilty verdict.

Why Rion, Rion & Rion?

Schedule a Free Case Evaluation Today
  1. 80 Years of Experience
  2. More than 500 Jury Trials Handled
  3. Free Initial Case Evaluation
  4. Available 24/7, 365 Days a Year
  5. 10.0 AVVO Rating
  6. President of the American Board of Criminal Lawyers
  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email address.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
    You entered an invalid number.
  • Please select an option.
  • Please enter a message.